Data Warehousing Institute 2005 Follow-Up Survey - Teradata VantageCloud Lake

Lake - Database Reference

Deployment
VantageCloud
Edition
Lake
Product
Teradata VantageCloud Lake
Release Number
Published
February 2025
ft:locale
en-US
ft:lastEdition
2025-11-21
dita:mapPath
ohi1683672393549.ditamap
dita:ditavalPath
pny1626732985837.ditaval
dita:id
ohi1683672393549

Three years later, a TDWI survey of the same industry sources reported the following list of most frequent contributors to data quality problems in their organizations:

Source Percentage
Data entry by employees 75
Inconsistent definitions for common terms 75
Data migration or conversion projects 46
Mixed expectations by users 40
External data 38
Data entry by customers

This includes typographical errors and information typed into the wrong fields made when entering data into forms on the World Wide Web. Human error can also have a significant effect on the security of your site (Liginlal, Sim, and Khansa, 2009).

26
System errors 25
Changes to source systems 20
Other   7
Source: Philip Russom, Taking Data Quality to the Enterprise Through Data Governance, The Data Warehousing Institute, 2005.

The percentages do not add to 100 because they do not represent the percentage of all errors contributed by each source. They represent the relative number of survey respondents who reported the associated data quality problem as a significant source of data quality problems in their organization.

The surveys cover the same error sources except that the 2005 survey adds the category “Inconsistent definitions for common terms,” which tied with “Employee data entry” as the number one source of data quality problems in the organization.

Data Quality Problem Source 2002 Survey Score 2005 Survey Score Percent Change
Data entry by employees 76 75           -1
Inconsistent definitions for common terms ø 75            0
Data migration or conversion problems 48 46           -2
Mixed expectations by users 46 40           -6
External data 34 38            4
Data entry by customers 25 26            1
System errors 26 25           -1
Changes to source systems 53 20         -33
Other 12   7           -5
Sources:
  • Wayne W. Eckerson, Data Quality and the Bottom Line: Achieving Business Success Through a Commitment to High Quality Data, Seattle, WA: The Data Warehousing Institute, 2002.
  • Philip Russom, Taking Data Quality to the Enterprise Through Data Governance, Chatsworth, CA: The Data Warehousing Institute, 2005.

The category “inconsistent definitions for common terms” was not measured in the 2002 survey.

Over three years time, the percent change, whether positive or negative, is, with two possible exceptions, not significant. The exceptions are the relatively small 6% drop in “Mixed expectations by users” and the significantly large 33% drop in “Changes to source systems.”

Of the 79% of the organizations surveyed that have a data quality initiative in place, the team leading that initiative in the 2005 survey is most likely to be the data warehousing group. In the 2002 survey, the data warehousing team was second to the IT department in terms of which was the more likely leader of the initiative. Unfortunately, 42% of those surveyed had no plans to institute a data governance initiative, while 8% had such an initiative already in place. 33% had an initiative under consideration, while another 17% had such a plan in either its design or implementation phase.