Equivalences Using IN/NOT IN, NOT, and ANY/ALL/SOME - Analytics Database - Teradata Vantage

SQL Functions, Expressions, and Predicates

Deployment
VantageCloud
VantageCore
Edition
Enterprise
IntelliFlex
VMware
Product
Analytics Database
Teradata Vantage
Release Number
17.20
Published
June 2022
Language
English (United States)
Last Update
2024-01-12
dita:mapPath
obm1628111499646.ditamap
dita:ditavalPath
qkf1628213546010.ditaval
dita:id
kby1472250656485
lifecycle
latest
Product Category
Teradata Vantage™

The following table provides equivalences for the ANY/ALL/SOME quantifiers, where op is IN or NOT IN.

This usage … Is equivalent to …
NOT (x op ALL (:a, :b, :c)) x NOT op ANY (:a, :b, :c)
x NOT op SOME (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x op ANY (:a, :b, :c)) x NOT op ALL (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x op SOME (:a, :b, :c))
NOT (x op (:a, :b, :c)) x NOT op (:a, :b, :c)

In the equivalences, if op is NOT IN, then NOT op is IN, not NOT NOT IN.

Here are some examples.

This expression … Is equivalent to …
NOT (x IN ANY (:a, :b, :c)) x NOT IN ALL (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x IN ALL (:a, :b, :c)) x NOT IN ANY (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x NOT IN ANY (:a, :b, :c)) x IN ALL (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x NOT IN ALL (:a, :b, :c)) x IN ANY (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x IN (:a, :b, :c)) x NOT IN (:a, :b, :c)
NOT (x NOT IN (:a, :b, :c)) x IN (:a, :b, :c)

Syntax 2: expression IN and NOT IN subquery

This syntax for IN and NOT IN is correct in either of the following two forms: